Architecture insurance requirements can create a problem after you've already won a project. Imagine signing a $25,000 design contract and starting work, only to discover later that the client requires $2 million in professional liability, umbrella coverage, cyber coverage, or coverage that must remain in place for years after the project ends.
If your firm doesn't carry those limits, the project can become more expensive than you expected. The client may also hold payment until you increase your coverage.
So we asked architects directly: Has this happened to you? Do you usually get the insurance requirements before signing, or do they show up buried in the contract? The responses showed that firms handle this situation in very different ways.
Link to original discussion:
One architect had already been burned by architecture insurance requirements
One architect described landing a new client as a sole proprietor and discovering, when it came time to sign the client's standard contract, that the client required much more general liability insurance than the firm carried. The contract also required workers' compensation coverage the firm didn't have.
The architect paid for the additional coverage because the project had enough margin to justify the cost. Still, the experience taught them a clear lesson: ask about insurance requirements before submitting the proposal, not after signing the contract.
Another commenter described a similar situation with a state-funded project. The team had reduced the project's scope specifically to keep the building outside the flood plain and avoid flood hazard insurance. The state still required the coverage.
Some Architects Push back or negotiate
Not every architect in the discussion accepted an unexpected requirement without question.
One commenter argued that architects need to negotiate when a client's request seems unreasonable, both in the coverage requested and in when the client raises the requirement. They argued that firms can create an expectation that they'll give in if they always absorb new requirements to protect the client relationship. Instead, firms should decide ahead of time which requirements they can accept and which ones they need to challenge.
Another architect said they had essentially ignored a $2 million professional liability requirement on one project and still received payment without a problem. Their view was that clients sometimes intend those higher limits for subcontractors working on the builder's side rather than for designers. They also pointed out that larger corporate clients are different because those clients often expect firms to follow their standard contract requirements.
Some firms build it into the proposal or use a change order
Several commenters described ways to address architecture insurance requirements before they become a problem.
One firm lists its existing coverage limits in every proposal and includes language allowing the firm to increase its fee if a client later requires additional insurance. The firm said this rarely became an issue beyond its usual $1 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate limits.
Another commenter takes a more direct approach. When a client or lender requires additional coverage, the firm sends a change order covering the cost of that insurance for the project period plus three years after completion. The commenter said the client either agrees to the additional cost or drops the requirement.
One architect who runs a solo office carries $1 million per claim and $2 million aggregate in professional liability, along with separate general liability coverage. They had considered increasing their limits, but their broker advised against it based on their circumstances. They reported paying about $8,000 per year for their coverage.
Controlling the language in your contract
One architect explained that they put their insurance limits directly into their own agreement. This lets them control what they promise instead of leaving the requirements entirely to the client's contract.
The architect had once entered the wrong limit into their own agreement. That mistake forced them to increase their coverage to match the limit they had already promised. Since then, they've paid closer attention to the insurance terms in their own contracts.
The practical issue is straightforward: your current insurance limits and your contractual obligations need to match. If your contract promises coverage you don't currently carry, you may have to increase your limits after you've already agreed to the work.
Whose fault is it if the requirement was buried?
Several commenters took a direct view of this issue. One said that if the contract contains the insurance requirement and you didn't read it, the responsibility falls on you. Another argued that if the requirement never appeared in the signed contract, the client shouldn't be able to impose it later or withhold payment because you don't carry it.
Several commenters also pointed out that clients don't always base insurance requirements on the size of the project. One said some clients request high limits simply because they can. Another mentioned avoiding work with a local public university because of what they considered excessive insurance requirements.
The most important question may need to be asked before you bid
Several commenters agreed on the same solution: get the insurance requirements and contract template when you bid, not after you sign. If the client hasn't provided them, ask for the documents or submit a formal request for information.
Before you finalize your fee, ask for:
- Required professional liability limit
- Required general liability limit
- Umbrella/excess requirements
- Cyber requirements
- Workers’ compensation requirements
- Additional insured requirements
- How long coverage must be maintained after project completion
Then compare those requirements with the coverage your firm actually carries before you price the work.
The bigger lesson from the discussion
The most useful part of the discussion wasn't whether architects should carry insurance. Most participants already did. The real issue was when they found out what the client required and how they responded once they discovered a gap.
Some firms absorbed the additional cost because the project had enough margin. Others negotiated with the client, built their existing limits into their proposals, or used a change order to recover the additional insurance cost. One firm set its own insurance terms in its contract to maintain control over the limits.
The approaches varied, but the architects who had dealt with this problem generally agreed on one point: finding out about an insurance requirement after setting the fee leaves the firm with fewer options.
What to check before you sign the next contract
- Get the insurance section of the contract. Don’t rely on a verbal description of the requirements.
- Send it to your broker. Ask whether your current policies satisfy the written requirements.
- Identify any gaps. For example, your professional liability may sit at $1 million while the contract requires $2 million, or the client may require cyber coverage you don’t currently carry.
- Find out what satisfying the requirement will cost. Don’t assume that doubling a limit will double your premium. Get actual pricing.
- Check how long the requirement lasts. This matters particularly for claims-made professional liability coverage when a contract requires coverage to continue after project completion.
- Decide how the additional cost affects the project. You can absorb it, negotiate it, include it in the fee, or decline a project that no longer makes financial sense. Making that decision before signing gives you more control over the outcome.
Hardcover Perspective
Review architecture insurance requirements alongside the project itself. A $2 million professional liability requirement might make sense for one firm and create a significant additional cost for another. The same requirement can have a very different impact on a $500,000 engagement and a $25,000 engagement.
At Hardcover, we work specifically with architecture, engineering, and other design firms. We can compare contractual insurance requirements with the coverage a firm currently carries and help identify potential gaps. Sometimes the existing policy already satisfies the requirement. Sometimes the firm needs higher limits. In other cases, the firm may want to discuss the requirement with the client before agreeing to it.
Related Questions
What architecture insurance requirements should I check before signing?
Review the professional liability, general liability, umbrella or excess, cyber, workers' compensation, additional insured, and post-completion coverage requirements in the contract.
Can a client require an architect to increase professional liability insurance?
Yes, if the firm agrees to that requirement in its contract. Firms should review those requirements before signing and discuss questions about enforceability with legal counsel.
Does umbrella insurance increase an architect's professional liability limit?
Not necessarily. As one commenter in the discussion pointed out, umbrella coverage commonly sits above general liability rather than professional liability. You need to review the actual policies to determine which coverage applies.
Can an architect charge a client for additional insurance?
Some firms include that possibility in their proposals, while others use a change order when a client later requires additional coverage. Both approaches appeared in the discussion.
When should architects review insurance requirements?
Before finalizing the fee and signing the contract, ideally at the bidding stage. That gives the firm time to identify coverage gaps, price the additional cost, and negotiate with the client if necessary.
Can an Umbrella Policy Satisfy a $2 Million Auto Liability Requirement?
Contract asking for $2 million in Auto Liability but your primary policy only carries $1 million? Here's how Umbrella and Excess coverage fit into that
Read MoreGeneral & Property Liability (BOP)
Helps respond when someone claims your business caused bodily injury or property damage.
Learn moreUmbrella Liability
Sits above multiple underlying policies and responds when primary limits are exhausted.
Learn more