We work with a lot of firms doing plan review and code compliance inspections in Florida. Almost every one of them has the same problem at some point: the policy they have was written for something they don’t do.
To be super clear, a private provider is not a design firm. You review plans and inspect work against the building, mechanical, electrical and plumbing codes. You hold a license as an engineer, architect or building code administrator, but on these projects you aren’t designing the building. Your insurance should say that.
What the statute requires
The insurance section of Florida Statute 553.791 (subsection 18 in the current statutes) is short. Here’s what it says, in plain terms:
- Professional liability covering all services you perform as a private provider. If you also do plan review, ask whether the policy covers it too.
- $1 million per occurrence / $2 million aggregate for any project with a construction cost of $5 million or less.
- $2 million per occurrence / $4 million aggregate for any project over $5 million. Construction cost is what’s on the building permit application.
- 5 years of coverage after the work if you use a claims-made policy. That means no gaps at renewal, and a plan for tail coverage if you ever stop. Tail options vary by carrier.
- An insurer authorized to do business in Florida, rated A or better by A.M. Best.
- A certificate of insurance on file with the local building official before you provide services in that jurisdiction.
The statute also lets the owner ask for more. These are minimums.
The “authorized insurer” problem
This is the part nobody explains. Most professional liability for small design and inspection firms is written by surplus lines (non-admitted) carriers. Under Florida insurance law, an authorized insurer generally means one holding a certificate of authority from the state. Surplus lines carriers work under a different set of rules.
We’ve had underwriters tell us their surplus lines or Lloyd’s policy satisfies 553.791 anyway. Maybe it does. But if a building official or an owner’s attorney reads the statute the other way, the risk sits with you, not the carrier.
So we do two things:
- Ask the underwriter to confirm in writing that the policy meets the insurance requirements of 553.791.
- Quote an admitted carrier alongside it, so you have a clean option if the answer isn’t clean.
Why private providers end up with the wrong policy
The application is usually the cause. An engineering application asks about design, structural, geotechnical and construction management. If you answer it like a design firm, the underwriter prices and words the policy like one.
The details underwriters actually want from a private provider:
- Plan review vs. inspections, and in-person vs. virtual.
- Residential vs. commercial, and the largest construction cost you take on.
- How much of your review touches structural sheets. A quick audit of your recent projects, showing what share of plan sheets are structural, gives underwriters something concrete instead of a guess.
- What you don’t do: structural design, threshold inspections, geotechnical work, materials testing, construction management.
Put that in writing up front. It saves weeks of back and forth, and it keeps the policy wording matched to the work.
Watch the exclusions
Two come up a lot with private providers:
- Condominiums. Some carriers exclude condominium work entirely. If you do single-unit interior renovations in condo buildings, ask whether that counts. Get the answer in writing. See how condo exclusions work.
- Specialty services. Admitted carriers often list services they won’t cover (asbestos, site safety consulting, CM at risk, materials testing, geotechnical and more). If you don’t do them, confirm it in writing so it doesn’t become a question later.
Before you send a certificate to a building official
- Limits match the largest project you’ll inspect.
- The policy describes private provider services, not engineering design.
- You know whether the carrier is admitted or surplus lines, and you have something in writing either way.
- If it’s claims-made, you know your retro date and your plan for 5 years after.
If any of those is a maybe, send us the policy and the requirements. We’ll tell you what we see.
Related: Code consultants and plan reviewers · Special inspection firms · How claims-made coverage works · Admitted vs non-admitted carriers