Short answer
A design-build coverage gap can appear when one firm acts as both designer and builder, and a claim falls between two policies. General liability policies commonly exclude professional services. A professional liability policy may treat the same claim as a construction matter. Report to both carriers at the same time. How each policy responds depends on its wording and the allegations.
How the design-build coverage gap happens
A design-build firm carries two main policies that were often written separately. The general liability policy generally responds to bodily injury and property damage, and it commonly excludes professional services. The professional liability policy generally responds to errors in professional services, and it may exclude or limit work that looks like contracting.
When a homeowner alleges both bad design and bad construction, each carrier can point to the other policy. The firm may be left in the middle while a response deadline runs. Firms that act as architect and general contractor on the same project face this risk more than most.
The scenario below is an anonymized composite based on a real claim file. Project details have been changed, and the matter was unresolved at the last update.
A scenario where each policy pointed to the other
A small design-build firm acted as architect and general contractor on a residential project. The homeowners were additional insureds under the contract, and they demanded that the firm report to its general liability carrier.
The homeowners later added a professional negligence count and moved to add the principal personally. The firm had hired its own lawyer and hadn’t reported to its insurers at first. When it did report, three things happened:
- The general liability carrier acknowledged the claim, but its policy excludes professional services
- The professional liability carrier issued a disclaimer
- The general liability examiner told the broker the insured might want to push back on the professional liability disclaimer, since the counterclaim plainly alleged professional negligence
The matter was unresolved at the last update. The same firm later received a state pre-suit construction-defect notice on another project and reported it to both carriers.
The disclaimer was challengeable, and pushing back on it was worth considering. Carrier positions at the start of a claim aren’t always final, and a broker can help build the argument for reconsideration. No one can promise the result.